Is the official story about the Oklahoma City bombing a lie?

Astounding evidence that the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City was done with explosives inside the building, not from a truck on the street, that Timothy McVeigh was an undercover agent of the government, not an anti-government terrorist, and even that his execution may have been faked. Sounds crazy – but only to those who are not aware of the facts in this report. -GEG

3 Comments

  1. While I publisher of a magazine called The PROBE (996-1999) I wrote an article addressing this very point. After talking with a Brigadier General who spent his life with munitions and another scientist in the petroleum industry who trained soldiers in making improvised explosives there was simply too much evidence that actual explosion came from INSIDE the building. Even ABC or CBS (I could look it up if you like) mentioned that a seismograph in OK city recorded two seperate explosions around 9 seconds apart. The UHaul on the front street was a diversion. The Media is easily manipulated by those in officialdom. They wanted a lone nut bomber as the fall guy. I found a fertilizer bomb is among the least efficient explosive weapons you can make. The energy in the bomb drops very quickly from the point of its explosion. The Brigadier General I interviewed displayed chart with the decreasing energy for the fertilizer bomb they told the public was used to destroy the Murrah building. In reality it would have only broken a few windows in the building. My article explored some of the reasons for this and the misinformation applied to cover up what really happened. There were efforts to correct this but they failed. A real tragedy as it helped those behind it feel immune to performing other similar operations in America and blaming political targets they wanted eliminated. I am also aware of Tim McVeighs desire to become more involved with the intelligence world. Similar to L.H. Oswald in a few aspects, both were used as patsy’s.

  2. I totally agree it was an inside job! Just like Ruby Ridge, Waco, Panama, Red Beckman, William Cooper, I could go on!

  3. Would like to add to previous comment, and thanks for getting this on Red Pill, many of my articles have been scrubbed by Google.
    In 1995 after the bombing occured I recorded CNN for around 3+ hours straight. During the first hour and a half or so there were no less than 10 mentions by the multiple CNN newscasters that a SECOND undexploded bomb had been recovered. These newscasters assured the audience this was not hearsay or a theory,but had talked to the local authorities and even showed previous video of a bomb removal squad coming to the scene earlier. It was around noon CST, when an interview with the head of the BTF occured and he stoutly claimed that all talk about a second recovered bomb was not true. Of course, he did this from Washington, D.C. not from the scene where people were looking at new evidence. Who do you believe? If you are still amongst the thinking you probably shouldn’t believe a Washington bureaucrat who is responding to who knows what. Still have a few issues of that article on the OK City Bombing in The PROBE, if anyone is interested.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*