This presentation is both provocative and challenging. It is provocative because it questions the source of some of our most cherished beliefs. It is challenging because, if we place it in the archives, it may appear that we agree with everything it contains – which, in some areas, is not the case. On the other hand, if we decline to place it in the archives, it may be seen as censoring ‘forbidden’ ideas– which would be in violation of our belief that the best chance of finding truth occurs when we have access to all points of view. There is much here that is highly worthy of consideration. 2018 Sep 25 – Source New Earth Project
Related Articles
All categories
The War between Citizen Science and Corporate Science
Post Views: 1,747 4.2 (17) MIT scientist Shiva Ayyadurai, PhD, argues that the scientific profession that once was dedicated to the discovery of truth has morphed into a community of con artists for hire to […]
All categories
Covid-1984, an Orwellian Analysis
Post Views: 1,783 4.7 (52) Here is a snapshot in time, as of as of May 8, 2020, that well represents the rising awareness and indignation among independent American podcasters on the topic of the […]
2 Comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Another recommended watch by Sacha Stone…” Deep analysis of the greatest mass deception ever perpetrated against humanity “ 2020
EXCELLENT-