This presentation is both provocative and challenging. It is provocative because it questions the source of some of our most cherished beliefs. It is challenging because, if we place it in the archives, it may appear that we agree with everything it contains – which, in some areas, is not the case. On the other hand, if we decline to place it in the archives, it may be seen as censoring ‘forbidden’ ideas– which would be in violation of our belief that the best chance of finding truth occurs when we have access to all points of view. There is much here that is highly worthy of consideration.
4.6 (22) Here is a snapshot in time, as of as of May 8, 2020, that well represents the rising awareness and indignation among independent American podcasters on the topic of the COVID-19 pandemic. Famous […]